In a stunning blow to American public broadcasting, President Donald Trump has signed an executive order cutting federal funding to National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), two of the country’s most respected and long-standing non-commercial media institutions. The decision has sent shockwaves through the media world, with journalists, free speech advocates, and international watchdogs warning of its grave implications for press freedom in the United States.
The executive order, which Trump announced during a campaign-style rally in Florida, declares that “taxpayer dollars will no longer be funneled into institutions that promote biased, left-wing propaganda.” In his remarks, Trump accused NPR and PBS of “deceiving the American public with woke ideology and fake news.”
This executive action comes just as Reporters Without Borders (RSF) released its annual Press Freedom Index, citing an “alarming deterioration” in press freedom in the United States. The RSF report placed particular emphasis on political hostility toward independent media, singling out the Trump administration’s repeated attacks on journalists and its attempts to delegitimize publicly funded broadcasters.
Public Broadcasters Under Fire
The primary targets of Trump’s executive order are NPR and PBS, which receive partial funding through the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB). While federal dollars constitute a small portion of NPR and PBS’s overall budgets—roughly 2% and 15% respectively—the impact is magnified locally.
More than 1,500 local public radio and television stations affiliated with NPR and PBS across the United States rely heavily on CPB grants to serve rural and underserved communities. These stations produce local journalism, children’s programming, and educational content—core services now under existential threat.
READ MORE: Voice of America (VOA) faces major budget cuts as US slashes government media funding
Media Fraternity Reacts with Alarm
The response from the media fraternity has been swift and fierce. PBS President Paula Kerger called the move “a betrayal of America’s promise to inform and educate its citizens without commercial or political influence.” NPR’s CEO, John Lansing, warned that the order could “cripple our ability to report independently, especially in the regions where journalism is vanishing.”
The Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ) and the American Press Institute issued joint statements condemning the executive order as a “direct assault on the First Amendment.” Media unions have also begun mobilizing, fearing mass layoffs in the months to come.
Thousands of Journalism Jobs at Risk
The decision is expected to affect nearly 4,000 journalists and media professionals working within the NPR and PBS ecosystems. Local affiliates in rural areas are particularly vulnerable, where federal funding often makes up more than 40% of operating budgets.
Small-town newsrooms, already reeling from advertising declines and newsroom consolidations, may be forced to shutter entirely, leaving “news deserts” in their wake. Media analysts warn that such closures would disproportionately affect minority, low-income, and elderly audiences who rely on PBS and NPR for trusted, accessible news.
A Storied Legacy Under Threat
Founded in 1970 and 1969 respectively, NPR and PBS were born out of the Public Broadcasting Act signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson. For over five decades, these institutions have delivered award-winning journalism, iconic programming such as PBS NewsHour, Frontline, and Morning Edition, and beloved children’s shows like Sesame Street and Arthur.
Combined, NPR and PBS support a nationwide workforce of approximately 10,000 employees, many of whom operate in non-profit, community-oriented environments. With this executive order, critics argue, Trump is not just defunding broadcasters—he is undermining a vital piece of America’s democratic infrastructure.
International Alarm Grows
The global reaction has been equally damning. RSF Director Christophe Deloire said the order “reflects a dangerous erosion of democratic norms,” and warned that the U.S. is “setting a chilling precedent” for authoritarian regimes worldwide.
As the battle over public broadcasting enters a new and uncertain chapter, many observers fear the damage may already be done. “This isn’t just about dollars,” said media historian Dr. Mary L. Gauthier. “It’s about dismantling trust, independence, and the very notion of public service in journalism.”
Pic Credit: NY Post
