Court Questions Punjab Government on PECA Amendment
PECA amendment 2025. The Lahore High Court has asked the Punjab government and the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority to submit their responses regarding the petitions against the PECA Amendment Act 2025. The case has sparked intense debate about freedom of expression and digital rights. The court adjourned the hearing while setting a deadline for responses.
Judicial Displeasure Over Delayed Responses
Justice Farooq Haider presided over the case filed by journalist organizations and other petitioners. The federal government presented its response in court but the Punjab government and PTA failed to do so. This delay led to the judge’s dissatisfaction. The PTA’s legal representative requested additional time. Justice Farooq Haider issued a strong warning and stated that if the parties do not submit their responses by the next hearing the law will take its course. The court set March 13 as the final deadline for responses.
The Core of the PECA Amendment Controversy
The petitioners have raised serious concerns regarding the PECA Amendment Act 2025. They argue that the amendments impose harsh penalties including a three-year prison sentence and heavy fines for spreading false information. According to the petitioners the PECA Act has been used as a silent weapon to control dissent. They claim that the new amendments will make it even more difficult for people to express their opinions freely. Many believe that these changes will severely impact journalists activists and ordinary citizens who use digital platforms to voice their concerns.
Lack of Stakeholder Consultation Raises Questions
Another major point of concern is that the government introduced the PECA Amendment Act 2025 without consulting relevant stakeholders. Petitioners argue that the absence of discussions with journalists media organizations and digital rights activists raises serious questions about the transparency of the amendment. They believe that any law affecting free speech should involve extensive consultation before implementation. Critics argue that bypassing public opinion weakens democratic values and increases mistrust in the legal system.
Freedom of Expression at Risk?
The controversy surrounding the PECA Amendment Act 2025 highlights the ongoing struggle between regulation and freedom of speech. Many critics argue that instead of protecting people from misinformation the law could be used to suppress dissenting voices. The fear is that these amendments will create a chilling effect where people become afraid to share their opinions online. Supporters of digital rights believe that the focus should be on promoting responsible journalism and combating fake news without restricting fundamental rights.
Awaiting the Court’s Decision
As the Lahore High Court waits for responses from the Punjab government and PTA the case has sparked a nationwide debate. Many are eager to see how the court will address concerns about press freedom and digital rights. The final decision could have significant consequences for online speech in Pakistan. If the controversial provisions of the PECA Amendment Act 2025 are struck down it would be seen as a victory for free speech. However if the amendments are upheld it could change how people use digital platforms in the future.
