Journalist Irshad Bhatti has issued a detailed clarification following social media backlash over his recent podcast interview with film star Meera, addressing the criticism and revealing key details.
Webdesk – MediaBites News | April 20, 2026
Irshad Bhatti has responded to mounting criticism following his controversial podcast interview with Meera, offering a detailed clarification and defending his approach.
In a statement shared after the backlash, Bhatti said some viewers had reacted after watching only short clips or promotional material, urging audiences to watch the full interview before forming opinions.
“Podcast was paid,” Bhatti reveals
Bhatti disclosed that the podcast was a paid engagement, arranged through an agency. He said he typically does not disclose such arrangements, noting that many guests charge for appearances and it is within their rights.
He clarified that the interview was not part of any film promotion but a standalone discussion.
Questions not new, says Bhatti
Addressing criticism over the nature of his questions, Bhatti said the topics raised during the interview had already been discussed multiple times in courts, media reports, and previous interviews.
“These were not new or surprise questions,” he stated.
Prior understanding with Meera
Bhatti further revealed that there was prior understanding between him and Meera before the recording. He said both had met earlier, discussed the topics in advance, and mutually agreed on the discussion points.
He added that Meera had even visited his home before the podcast, where all major issues were discussed.
“Watch the full podcast”
He emphasized that the full interview reflects a different tone than the short clips circulating online, adding that Meera appeared comfortable and engaged throughout the conversation.
According to Bhatti, Meera ended the podcast on a positive note and even agreed to return for another session to answer additional questions.
Acknowledging criticism
While defending his position, Bhatti said he respects public opinion and acknowledged that “some things could have been handled better.”
He also indicated that he would address the matter in more detail in an upcoming vlog.
Ongoing debate
The controversy has sparked wider debate on interview ethics, media conduct, and the boundaries of questioning public figures, with opinions sharply divided across social media platforms.
