The long-awaited May 9 convictions Pakistan have finally been announced, bringing wholesale judgements against key PTI leaders and workers. Figures such as Yasmin Rashid, Omar Ayub, Shibli Faraz, and Punjab opposition leader Ahmed Bachchar have been found guilty. The verdicts rely heavily on testimony from prosecution witnesses who were reportedly present at Zaman Park during the alleged planning of violent events.
However, the timing of these convictions—more than two years after the incidents—has raised questions. Many who were already jailed remain in prison. While those who escaped trial continue to live freely, with little sign of imminent arrests. Observers are puzzled about why these decisions have been delivered now when the government already enjoys parliamentary stability. And faces no major internal threats from PTI, which is seen as fractured and strategically weak.
Some analysts believe these convictions serve as a political message—demonstrating that the system is firmly in control and capable of further fragmenting PTI if needed. Others argue it is a way to ensure May 9 is not forgotten or dismissed as mere political drama. Announcing the military courts’ verdicts, proponents say, shows seriousness in bringing those responsible to justice and reinforces that May 9’s events were unacceptable.
Yet, these judgements risk damaging judicial credibility, especially if appeals are filed and higher courts challenge the decisions. This could lead to more scrutiny of the post-26th Amendment judiciary and fuel doubts about fairness in the legal process.
Ultimately, the convictions may aim to display strength and control. But they also spark debate on whether this delayed justice can truly reshape public perception of May 9 or simply deepen political divisions in Pakistan.
This article was written by Arifa Noor and published in Dawn.
